Agile Proposal Development: A Spotlight on Two Common Tracking Tools
Three weeks ago, I posted an article that discussed how
proposal management is in actuality project management. I pointed out how our
long-standing proposal best practices are Agile,
and have been Agile long before Agile was the latest industry craze. I have
been so pleased with the discussion that this article has sparked.
I have been building on some of these discussion points in a
series of articles focused on how we can expand the application of Agile in our
opportunity pursuit processes. The first week I discussed the role of stakeholders and explored how we can better integrate stakeholders into the business
development lifecycle. Last week I took look at Scrum,
how our proposal best practices fit into the Scrum model, and how we can learn
further from Agile ideologies to improve our proposal processes. This week I’ll
take a look at some common Agile tools and discuss how we might apply them to
increase the efficiency of our proposal processes.
Tools for Tracking
Progress
Once the Scrum Team completes the Sprint Planning Meeting
and defines the sprint commitment, they begin tracking their progress using
highly visible information tracking tools. These tools include the Task Board
and the Burn Down Chart.
Task Board: The
Scrum Team uses the Task Board to track the progress of the tasks associated
with each feature. The minimum columns used to track the progress are:
- To Do
- Doing
- Done
Task Boards drive the daily stand-up meeting. The Task Board
allows the team to move items across the board while discussing the progress
made the previous day, what they plan to accomplish that day, and what
challenges they are facing. Task Boards originated using a whiteboard and sticky
notes (often called a Kanban board), which encourage individuals outside the
team to view and discuss the team’s progress.
Though many teams still prefer the physical board, others
are using software to streamline the process and share information across
multiple locations. The use of software is arguably more popular in a software
development application; however, we have learned that some proposal teams have
actually started leveraging Task Board software. For example, TQI Solutions has
started using JIRA Kanban Boards to manage their proposal efforts! You can find an example Task Board applied to
a proposal scenario below.
Task Boards are great because they are a visual
representation of the team’s progress and major hurdles. Because they are
simple and very visible, there is no question as to how the team is
progressing. Too often on stand-up calls, Section Leads downplay any challenges
they are facing and overstate the progress they are making. By breaking down
section progress into tangible tasks, tracking the progress of those tasks, and
being honest about the challenges faced, we can increase the effectiveness of
our daily stand-ups and eliminate the number of issues identified too late in
the game. By adding Task Boards into
our proposal development process, we can increase communication, better track
progress and challenges, reduce the number of color team surprises, and foster
a smoother process overall.
Burn Down Chart: The
Burn Down chart shows the trend line of the amount of work left to do in the
sprint. The x-axis is the number of days in the sprint, and the y-axis is the
number of hours for all the tasks that were defined in the sprint-planning
meeting. Over the days of the sprint, the line indicating the amount of work
left to do should trend down to zero by the last day of the sprint. The Burn
Down Chart should correlate to the tasks and progress reflected in the Sprint
Backlog. Below you can find an example of how you might use Sprint Backlog and correlating
Burn Down Chart on a proposal sprint.
The Burn Down Chart is useful because it is a high-level
picture of how the team is progressing. By comparing the planned progress
versus the actual progress, the team can identify where the major hurdles have
occurred, and use this information to improve moving forward.
Final Thoughts
With Agile, success stems from iterative development,
collaboration, and regular stakeholder feedback—and it’s no different with
proposals. As our tried and true best practices have shown, this iterative
development, collaboration, and regular stakeholder feedback supports a
successful proposal development process. But as we have highlighted over the
last several weeks, there are areas where we can still improve. When leveraging
the Agile Scrum framework, sprint progress is typically tracked using the Task
Board, Burn Down Chart, and the daily stand-up. Our best practices embrace the
stand-up, but the Task Board and Burn Down Chart are used far less frequently.
By adding these two tools into our best practices, we can increase the
effectiveness of our proposal development process. We will have a much clearer
picture of what is tasks are in progress and whether they will likely be
completed on time; what tasks have been completed and whether they were
completed on time; and perhaps most critically, what hurdles might be
preventing the team from meeting its sprint (color team) and/or final delivery
goal.
Written by Ashley Kayes, CP APMP
Senior Proposal Consultant, AOC Key Solutions, Inc. (KSI)
Those rules moreover attempted to wind up plainly a decent approach to perceive that other individuals online have the indistinguishable enthusiasm like mine to get a handle on incredible arrangement more around this condition
ReplyDeleteProject Management Apps
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the article. By utilizing modern and professional BI tools, each challenge can be addressed promptly, without the need for massive IT involvement. Know more details from www.inetsoft.com
ReplyDelete